arXiv Machine Learning By Noman Sadiq, Mohsen Toorani

Differentially Private EEG Feature Anonymization: A Privacy-Utility Case Study in Clinical Neurophysiology

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates how subject‑level differential privacy (DP) can anonymize EEG‑derived feature representations while preserving clinical utility. It evaluates Gaussian and Laplace perturbations across three deployment scenarios—client‑side, server‑side, and decentralized local training—using statistical utility metrics and a downstream machine‑learning task. Results indicate that DP can be integrated into EEG workflows, but the choice of mechanism, privacy parameters, and sensitivity calibration critically affects data utility, especially in small, imbalanced clinical datasets.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Picture the Epsilon: Pursuing Identity-Level Privacy Guarantees for Images

The paper compares four audit methods for assessing identity‑level differential privacy in pre‑trained, black‑box face generators. Each method—GaussMech, KDE‑LR, MMD‑TV, and ROC‑HT—has distinct assumptions, hyperparameters, and finite‑sample limitations, and they produce markedly different epsilon estimates when applied to FaceFusion and InstantID. The study finds that all methods reveal significant identity distinguishability, but none can be reliably ranked in this high‑distinguishability regime, suggesting that future work should evaluate them on partially private mechanisms.

By Arman Zareian Jahromi, Vishnu Bondalakunta, Mohammad Akbar Bin Shah, Naimul Haque, Shuangqing Wei, George T. Amariucai