arXiv AI
Different representation learning objectives recover distinct latent structures from the same psychometric data
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 20
An efficient adaptive dimension selection algorithm for multidimensional probit graded response models
Multidimensional graded response models (MGRMs) are widely used for analyzing ordinal questionnaire data in psychological and educational assessments. A central challenge in applying these models is determining the number of latent dimensions.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21
An efficient adaptive dimension selection algorithm for multidimensional probit graded response models
arXiv:2607. 17654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multidimensional graded response models (MGRMs) are widely used for analyzing ordinal questionnaire data in psychological and educational assessments.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Do Assessment Instruments Measure the Same Thing for Humans and LLMs? A Latent Structure Analysis
arXiv:2608. 15630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid development and growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) have made it increasingly important to understand their capabilities.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5
LEVANTE-bench: Multi-Scale Comparison of VLMs to Children Using Cognitive Tasks (or, "Is Your VLM Smarter Than a 5th Grader?")
arXiv:2606. 05497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Given the inherently multimodal nature of human experience, vision-language models (VLMs) hold substantial promise for modeling human cognition as it grows and develops with experience.
arXiv AI
Jul 29
CogArena: A Multimethod Evaluation of Cognitive Ability Structure in Large Language Models
arXiv:2607. 24999v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM cognitive scores are increasingly summarized as per-ability profiles whose dimensions should converge across tasks, respond selectively to matched interventions, and generalize beyond the models used to define them.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Reconstructing Item Characteristic Curves using Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
arXiv:2601. 02580v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Traditional methods for determining assessment item parameters, such as difficulty and discrimination, rely heavily on expensive field testing to collect student performance data for Item Response Theory (IRT) calibration.