Different Facets of Verbalised Overconfidence: an Interpretability Study
Read the original on arXiv AI →The study examines how the large language model Qwen3-4B exhibits overconfidence across three expressions of uncertainty—verbal epistemic markers, abstention, and numeric confidence scores—using controlled reasoning scenarios that vary logical necessity and possibility. Findings confirm a pronounced overconfidence tendency, especially when numeric scores are requested, and reveal that certainty is generated by a broad coalition of shared features while uncertainty relies on a sparse set of dedicated features. By intervening on these uncertainty features, the researchers demonstrate causal evidence of the imbalance driving overconfidence and show that this intervention can mitigate overconfident errors across different settings, languages, and an out‑of‑distribution modality task.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.