arXiv Machine Learning July 15, 2026 By Zongye Lyu

Did We Actually Fix It? An Independent Adversarial Stress-Test of Post-Point-Adjustment Evaluation Metrics for Time-Series Anomaly Detection

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 11969v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Point-adjustment (PA), long the default scoring protocol in time-series anomaly detection (TSAD), was shown by Kim et al.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI

Jun 16

Auditing Reward Hackability in Code RL Training Environments

arXiv:2606. 16062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We measure the rate at which code RL environments accept incorrect solutions as correct.

By Shreshth Rajan

llms reinforcement-learning

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 10

What Demonstration Curation Metrics Do to Your Policy

arXiv:2606. 10229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study whether demonstration-curation metrics that detect defective training episodes also improve the downstream behavior-cloning policy that trains on the curated data.

By Aarav Bedi

benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 19

Calibration Without Comprehension: Diagnosing the Limits of Fine-Tuning LLMs for Vulnerability Detection in Systems Software

arXiv:2606. 20502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Whether LLMs scoring well on vulnerability benchmarks genuinely reason about security or merely pattern-match on contaminated data remains unresolved.

By Arastoo Zibaeirad, Marco Vieira

llms fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 6

Just Repair: A Minimal Denoising Network for Time Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2604. 17388v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time series anomaly detectors have grown steadily more complex, incorporating attention mechanisms, adversarial training, and stochastic latent variables.

By Kadir-Kaan \"Ozer, Ren\'e Ebeling, Markus Enzweiler

benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 23