arXiv AI By Jingyu Liu, Xiaopeng Wu, Kehan Chen, Chuan Yu, Yong Liu

Diagnosing Task Insensitivity in Language Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 26918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models can serve as capable long-horizon agents, but their out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization remains weak.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

Diagnosing Task Insensitivity in Language Agents

Large language models can serve as capable long-horizon agents, but their out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization remains weak. We identify a key source of this failure as task insensitivity: when faced with similar but distinct tasks, models might apply patterns learned during training and fail to solve the task at hand.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 16

Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Act

The paper investigates how reinforcement learning can cause large language model agents to adopt shortcut policies for tool use, relying on superficial prompt cues rather than actual task needs. By creating synthetic environments that mix factual QA and math reasoning, the authors show that agents often invoke tools when cues are present, even when those tools are unnecessary, with spurious invocation rates rising up to 39%. They find that shortcut learning occurs mainly when agents have already mastered the target tool and that semantic alignment between cues and tools amplifies the effect. To counter this, they propose a dense, decision-level reward where an LLM judge assesses tool necessity, which reduces cue-driven tool use while maintaining performance.

By Yiwei Yang, Haoxiang Zhang, Bingbing Wen, Yao Lu, Yuchen Wu, Lei Zhang, Julian McAuley, Pan Lu, Bill Howe
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Prompt-Robust Language Models: Which Training Strategies Work?

The paper investigates how different training strategies affect the prompt sensitivity of large language models. It reproduces and compares methods such as refined data construction and robustness objectives, finding that while robustness fine‑tuning improves over standard fine‑tuning and in‑context learning, the prompt gap remains large (40–57%). Notably, newer techniques like CoIN and PPCL often underperform a simple data‑construction approach that uses one template per batch, and diagnostics suggest that mixed‑template batches force the optimizer to reconcile conflicting updates rather than learn a prompt‑agnostic representation.

By Frederic Sadrieh, Michal \v{S}tef\'anik
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Skill Reuse as Compression in Agentic RL

The paper introduces ReuseRL, a method that applies the Minimum Description Length principle to agentic reinforcement learning. By extracting a shared skill dictionary from successful trajectories and adding a segmentation cost to the RL objective, ReuseRL discourages idiosyncratic behaviors and promotes reusable abstract patterns. Experiments on ALFWorld, TextWorld-Cooking, and Countdown-Stepwise show that ReuseRL improves both in‑distribution and out‑of‑distribution success compared to vanilla GRPO and other baselines.

By Zhikun Xu, Yu Feng, Jacob Dineen, Taiwei Shi, Jieyu Zhao, Ben Zhou