The paper introduces On-Policy Attention Self-Distillation (OPASD), a method that augments token-level supervision with solution-conditioned attention distillation for reasoning models. OPASD projects a privileged teacher’s attention onto student-visible positions, renormalizes the distribution, and aligns it with the student. Experiments on three model sizes and four math benchmarks show that OPASD improves accuracy by 4.98–8.40 percentage points, reduces generated tokens by 73.9%, cuts compute by 72.6%, and trains 1.53× faster compared to token-only distillation.
By Safaeid Hossain Arib, Rabeya Akter, Ismam Nur Swapnil, Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi, Tasnim Mohiuddin, Md Mofijul Islam
arXiv:2609.33455v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its own trajectories using dense token-level feedback from a stronger teacher model. Since e...
By Zizhuo Lin, Quanling Liu, Yi Yang, Yawei Luo
arXiv:2608. 03632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-Policy distillation (OPD) transfers teacher capabilities by supervising student-sampled trajectories with dense token-level teacher signals.
By Yinuo Jiang, Yongjie Ye, Zhou Tao, Xiang Zhuang, Qiang Zhang, Huajun Chen, Tiankai Li
arXiv:2605. 12400v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), where a language model improves its reasoning ability by distilling privileged teacher distributions along its own on-policy trajectories.
By Yuxiao Yang, Xiaoyun Wang, Weitong Zhang
On-Policy distillation (OPD) transfers teacher capabilities by supervising student-sampled trajectories with dense token-level teacher signals. Recent selective OPD methods improve this process by prioritizing signals that are confident, informative, or learnable.
SOD: Step-wise On-policy Distillation for Small Language Model Agents proposes a new framework that adaptively reweights distillation strength at each reasoning step based on step-level divergence. This approach mitigates cascading errors in tool-integrated reasoning by attenuating misleading teacher signals in high-divergence regions while preserving dense guidance where student and teacher align. Experiments on math, science, and code benchmarks show up to 20.86% improvement over the second-best baseline, with a 0.6B student scoring 26.13% on AIME 2025.
By Qiyong Zhong, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Xin Lin, Jie Sun, Houcheng Jiang, Xiang Wang, Junfeng Fang