Detecting and Explaining Fake News Short Videos with Multimodal Content and Real-World Evidence
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2606. 07651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditional fake news detection methods are falling behind as multimodal misinformation grows more advanced, seamlessly blending deceptive text, manipulated visuals, and factually incorrect claims.
arXiv:2608.22832v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The social interactions among crowds via \textit{Danmaku} (a.k.a., bullet comments) on modern multimedia platforms can facilitate both viewpoint confli...
arXiv:2607. 18080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal video misinformation detection is commonly formulated as a holistic video-understanding task, where the entire video and its associated content are processed and judged in a single pass.
arXiv:2608. 06732v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent text-to-video (T2V) generation models enable fake news videos to be synthesized from scratch, shifting the threat beyond cheap fakes assembled from existing footage.
arXiv:2601. 14954v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Social media increasingly disseminates information through mixed image text posts, but rumors often exploit subtle inconsistencies and forged content, making detection based solely on post content difficult.
Multimodal video misinformation detection is commonly formulated as a holistic video-understanding task, where the entire video and its associated content are processed and judged in a single pass. However, real-world misinformation often exhibits a sparse and compositional evidence structure: a reliable decision may depend on only a few coupled clues, while most video content contributes limited additional information.