arXiv:2607. 21820v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detectors are trained to distinguish genuine speech from synthetic speech and often perform well on standard benchmarks.
By Daniyal Kabir Dar, Arun Ross
arXiv:2606. 10911v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Claims about the robustness and fairness of deepfake speech detectors are only as credible as the datasets used to train and evaluate those systems.
By Vojt\v{e}ch Stan\v{e}k, Eva Trnovsk\'a, Kamil Malinka, Anton Firc
arXiv:2606. 10246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Maliciously-created fake speech, including deepfaked and spoofed audio, is proliferating at an alarming rate, and detection models are racing to stay ahead of the curve.
By Ashley R. Keaton, Zahra Khanjani, Christine Mallinson, Vandana P. Janeja
arXiv:2607. 28351v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech deepfake detection has expanded in scope with increasingly heterogeneous spoofing mechanisms, including speech synthesis, voice conversion, vocoder reconstruction, and neural-codec resynthesis.
By Wan Lin, Li Wang, Jindong Wang, Kunyu Feng, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2603. 10725v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The modern generative audio models can be used by an adversary in an unlawful manner, specifically, to impersonate other people to gain access to private information.
By Artem Dvirniak, Evgeny Kushnir, Dmitrii Tarasov, Artem Iudin, Oleg Kiriukhin, Mikhail Pautov, Dmitrii Korzh, Oleg Y. Rogov
arXiv:2607. 09891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detection models determine whether speech is genuine or artificially generated, but high overall accuracy can mask substantial performance disparities across demographic groups.
By Aishwarya R. Fursule, Vamshi Nallaguntla, Shruti Kshirsagar, Anderson R. Avila