arXiv:2607. 28351v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech deepfake detection has expanded in scope with increasingly heterogeneous spoofing mechanisms, including speech synthesis, voice conversion, vocoder reconstruction, and neural-codec resynthesis.
By Wan Lin, Li Wang, Jindong Wang, Kunyu Feng, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2607. 03418v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A trustworthy and GDPR-compliant deepfake audio detector must base its decisions on acoustic artifacts, not on what is being said or who is speaking.
By Nicolas M. M\"uller, Aditya Tirumala Bukkapatnam, Dominik Schnieders, Zohaib Ahmed
arXiv:2607. 14753v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in text-to-speech and voice cloning make high-quality spoofing inexpensive and scalable, threatening voice authentication systems, especially automatic speaker verification (ASV).
By Sofya Savelyeva, Mariia Perunova, Evgeny Kushnir, Artem Dvirniak, Dmitrii Korzh, Oleg Y. Rogov
arXiv:2603. 14033v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Audio anti-spoofing systems are typically trained to assign one authenticity label to an entire speech utterance.
By Shree Harsha Bokkahalli Satish, Harm Lameris, Joakim Gustafson, \'Eva Sz\'ekely
arXiv:2607. 09891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detection models determine whether speech is genuine or artificially generated, but high overall accuracy can mask substantial performance disparities across demographic groups.
By Aishwarya R. Fursule, Vamshi Nallaguntla, Shruti Kshirsagar, Anderson R. Avila
arXiv:2606. 10246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Maliciously-created fake speech, including deepfaked and spoofed audio, is proliferating at an alarming rate, and detection models are racing to stay ahead of the curve.
By Ashley R. Keaton, Zahra Khanjani, Christine Mallinson, Vandana P. Janeja
arXiv:2603. 10827v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech-aware large language models (LLMs) can accept speech inputs, yet their training objectives largely emphasize linguistic content or specific fields such as emotions or the speaker's gender, leaving it unclear whether they encode speaker identity.
By Thomas Thebaud, Yuzhe Wang, Laureano Moro-Velazquez, Jesus Villalba-Lopez, Najim Dehak
arXiv:2607. 14846v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current voice AI benchmarks typically evaluate isolated capabilities such as speech intelligibility, word error rate, or text-based dialogue quality, but they rarely test whether systems harness the acoustic information that distinguishes spoken language from its textual representation.
By David Ayllon, Alice Baird, Jeffrey Brooks, Franc Camps-Febrer, Jakub Piotr C{\l}apa, Theo Lebryk, Jens Madsen, Olya Ossipova, Sharath Rao, Hoon Shin, Tigran Soghbatyan, Georg Streich, Rashish Tandon, Panagiotis Tzirakis
arXiv:2606. 29544v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Proteus, a framework developed at Resemble AI for automated robustness testing of our audio deepfake detection system.
By Nicolas M. M\"uller, Aditya Tirumala Bukkapatnam, Zohaib Ahmed
arXiv:2606. 10912v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deepfake speech detectors often output a single score without explaining why an audio sample is flagged, where in the signal the evidence lies, or what cues drive the decision.
By Vojt\v{e}ch Stan\v{e}k, Veronika Jirmusov\'a, Anton Firc, Kamil Malinka, Jakub Re\v{s}, Martin Pere\v{s}\'ini
arXiv:2503. 17577v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deepfakes have emerged as a widespread and rapidly escalating concern in generative AI, spanning images, audio, and videos.
By Xiang Li, Pin-Yu Chen, Wenqi Wei
arXiv:2607. 11706v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern LLM-driven text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC) systems produce synthetic speech that differs from the generators represented in many legacy spoofing benchmarks.
By Aastha Sharma, Guangjing Wang