arXiv:2607. 05685v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used as private, always-available conversational systems, but little is known about how people with depressive symptoms use them.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608.29010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: People share mental health diagnoses on social media, yet how such language becomes visible around their self-disclosure, and whether community engag...
arXiv:2609.35953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Young people increasingly turn to General-Purpose Conversational Agents (GPCAs), such as ChatGPT, in moments of distress. We examine young adults' (age...
The paper introduces the COmmunity-centered Peer Engaged Support (COPES) dataset and a three‑axis evaluation framework to gauge how well Large Language Models (LLMs) align with community perspectives on mental‑health support queries. Experiments show that fine‑tuning LLMs on COPES improves strategy alignment and emotion‑tone alignment by over 50% for general‑purpose models, yet these gains are uneven across subreddits and coping strategies. The study also finds that post‑training shifts the model’s recommendations toward problem‑focused advice while reducing emotion‑focused responses, indicating persistent disparities in performance across different communities and needs.
arXiv:2409.02244v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used as ad hoc therapists. While prior research has found that LLMs outperform human coun...
The study examines how large language models (LLMs) predict depression scores from language responses. In a "Mirror" setup, participants answered structured diagnostic interviews that the LLMs used to predict scores, yielding near-perfect predictions. In a "Non-Mirror" setup, participants gave life history interviews; the LLMs still achieved outstanding prediction accuracy, and both conditions correlated similarly with PHQ-9 scores, indicating that the Mirror advantage disappears when predicting an independent measure. Topic modeling showed different depression themes across interview types, suggesting Mirror evaluations are more about reliability than validity and that Non-Mirror approaches may enhance clinical relevance.
arXiv:2606. 27247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In NLP, mental health conditions are often modeled as isolated phenomena, without interpersonal context.