arXiv:2606. 30372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantitative research across the social and behavioral sciences depends on human subject experiments that are expensive, slow, and subject to sampling bias.
By Haobo Yang
arXiv:2606. 19354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) by investing additional compute at inference time.
By Ardit Krasniqi, Luan Vejsiu, Elira Dervishi
arXiv:2609.36945v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We study the learning dynamics of fine-tuning a policy model on self-generated and reward-weighted data, with particular focus on a generalized version...
By Zhiwei Wang, Yanxi Chen, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding
arXiv:2603. 06957v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study post-training linear autoregressive models with outcome and process rewards.
By Alireza Mousavi-Hosseini, Murat A. Erdogdu
Large Language Bayes (LLB) samples probabilistic programs from a language model, runs approximate inference on each, and averages them weighted by an exponentiated evidence bound. The authors demonstrate that this weighting is not invariant to reparameterisation, unlike the log marginal likelihood, leading to significant discrepancies in weights across different program formulations. These discrepancies can reach up to 31.9×, affect Bayes factors, and introduce controlled errors in posterior estimates.
By Jian Xu
The paper presents a new scaling law for reward optimization in AI alignment, showing that performance scales as Θ(√min{log(M), K}), where M is the number of preference comparisons used to train a proxy reward model and K is the KL‑divergence budget relative to a reference policy. The authors derive this law using an information‑theoretic model, prove its tightness, and validate it with extensive experiments involving a 70B gold reward model and smaller proxy models (0.6B–4B). The empirical results demonstrate a strong fit (R² 97–99 %) across different model sizes, noise levels, and optimization methods, suggesting that reward optimization behaves like a simple selection task over IID Gaussian variables with noisy feedback.
By Ali Aouad, Aymane El Gadarri, Vivek F. Farias