arXiv AI By Hefeng Zhou, Jinxuan Zhang, Jiong Lou, Yuxin Liu, Chaochao Lu, Jingjing Qu, Jie Li

Deep Interaction: An Efficient Human-AI Interaction Method for Large Reasoning Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 14049v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly enhanced the ability of large language models (LLMs) to tackle complex, multi-step tasks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

GRACE: Step-Level Benchmark for Faithful Reasoning over Context

GRACE is a step‑level benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of chain‑of‑thought reasoning over context. It provides human annotations for each step in CoT traces from 10 models across 4 datasets, labeling faithfulness, error category, and natural‑language explanations. The benchmark introduces a data‑driven taxonomy that splits errors into GRACE‑Inference (deductive) and GRACE‑Grounding (factual) tracks, each with four categories, and demonstrates that incorporating step‑level faithfulness signals can improve downstream accuracy and reasoning reliability.

By Hoang Pham, Dong Le, Anh Tuan Luu
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Addressing the Reasoning Gap: Mechanistic Circuit-Based Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models

The paper introduces MCircKE, a mechanistic circuit-based knowledge editing framework for large language models. MCircKE identifies the causal circuits involved in a specific reasoning task and surgically updates parameters only within those circuits, thereby addressing the reasoning gap where edited facts are not used in multi-step reasoning. Experiments on the MQuAKE-series benchmarks show that this approach improves multi-hop reasoning performance after knowledge editing.

By Tianyi Zhao, Yinhan He, Wendy Zheng, Chen Chen