arXiv:2608.29928v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: State-of-the-art monocular body recovery methods predict mesh vertices and angles on the corresponding kinematic tree, but their outputs lack biomechan...
By R. James Cotton, J. D. Peiffer, Lucinda Williamson, John Leske, Georgios Pavlakos
arXiv:2610.20124v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Human mesh recovery (HMR) provides a geometric foundation for understanding human motion, but accurately reconstructing both body motion and fine hand...
By Zhengjie Xu, Ruihao Gong, Xianglong Liu
arXiv:2609.18406v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recovering 3D human body motion from video is important for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and sports performance evaluation. For prost...
By Yilin Wen, Kechuan Dong, Fumiya Suginaka, Ken Endo, Yusuke Sugano
Recovering 3D human body motion from video is important for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and sports performance evaluation. For prosthesis users, this requires capturing both natural...
This scoping review examined 117 studies on video-based markerless motion capture, most published from 2024 onward and focused on healthy adults walking in laboratories. The studies identified five main pipeline architectures, but most reported only raw joint angles without biomechanical refinement, achieving sagittal lower‑limb agreement of about 5–6°, which falls short of clinical acceptability. Validation of out‑of‑plane kinematics, kinetics, and performance in older or pathological populations was rare, and emerging computer‑vision techniques such as foundation‑model mesh recovery and differentiable inverse kinematics were largely absent from validated work.
By Florian Delaplace (LAMHESS, CHU), Elodie Piche (LAMHESS), Fr\'ed\'eric Chorin (IUF, LAMHESS), Raphael Zory (IUF, LAMHESS)
arXiv:2607. 08725v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent progress in 3D human pose estimation has made markerless recovery of skeletal motion increasingly accurate and scalable.
By Ayda Eghbalian, Kevin Desai