arXiv:2610.32220v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Autoregressive vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to ground generated text in the correct image regions, and existing explainability methods, such...
By Parsa Esmaeilkhani, Longin Jan Latecki
arXiv:2507.00754v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The integration of Large Language Model (LLMs) blocks with Vision Transformers (ViTs) holds immense promise for vision-only tasks by leveraging the...
By Selim Kuzucu, Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Anna Kukleva, Federico Tombari, Bernt Schiele
arXiv:2607.09086v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We present Subtoken Vision Transformer (SubViT), a selective image tokenization method for fine-grained visual recognition. Standard Vision Transfo...
By Jie Zhu, Ivy Zhang, Minchul Kim, Xiaoming Liu
arXiv:2605.12491v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Vision Transformers (ViTs) learn rich visual-semantic representations through all-to-all self-attention among patch tokens. However, this design im...
By Alan Z. Song, Yinjie Chen, Mu Nan, Deva Ramanan, Michael J. Tarr, Andrew F. Luo
arXiv:2511. 19418v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at reasoning in linguistic space but struggle with perceptual understanding that requires dense visual perception, e.
By Yiming Qin, Bomin Wei, Jiaxin Ge, Konstantinos Kallidromitis, Stephanie Fu, Trevor Darrell, XuDong Wang
The paper introduces V‑GIFT, a lightweight method that enhances visual instruction tuning for multimodal large language models by incorporating a small set of visually grounded self‑supervised tasks expressed as natural language instructions. These tasks—such as rotation prediction, color matching, and cross‑view correspondence—are reformulated into image‑instruction‑response triplets, providing supervision that cannot be solved without visual evidence. The approach requires no human annotations, architectural changes, or extra training stages, and consistently improves vision‑centric performance across various models, regimes, and benchmarks when only 3‑10% of the training data is augmented with these instructions.
By Sophia Sirko-Galouchenko, Monika Wysoczanska, Andrei Bursuc, Nicolas Thome, Spyros Gidaris