arXiv:2606. 10632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lipschitz-style individual fairness formalizes the idea that semantically similar examples should receive similar predictions, but its evaluation in multi-task learning (MTL) can be confounded by method-induced representation scales.
By Junbo Ding, Xin Zang, Chenchen Pan, Donghao Song, Jiaxin Zhu, Danhuai Guo
arXiv:2606. 27948v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations (CFs) help understand machine learning models by identifying minimal input changes that would lead to alternative model outcomes.
By Xuan Zhao, Lena Krieger, Zhuo Cao, Arya Bangun, Hanno Scharr, Ira Assent
arXiv:2606. 08275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When an LLM agent fails -- issues a refund it should not have, calls the wrong tool, leaks data -- existing tooling answers what happened (observability) or whether it passed (evaluation), but not which step caused the failure.
By Jaineet Shah
arXiv:2608. 06469v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Collaborative machine learning among financial institutions must be both group-fair and robust against deliberate adversarial manipulation.
By Devharsh Trivedi, Nesrine Kaaniche, Nikos Triandopoulos, Maryline Laurent, Jackson Walters
arXiv:2608. 09899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In fair ranked link prediction, demographic parity ($\Delta_\mathrm{DP}$) is a common fairness metric.
By Valentijn Oldenburg, Floris de Kam, Stef de Wildt, Jarno Nilson Balk
arXiv:2607. 28945v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic tabular data is increasingly used in privacy-preserving data sharing, data augmentation, and to mitigate downstream classifier bias.
By Nitish Nagesh, Mahdi Bagheri, Amir M. Rahmani