arXiv Machine Learning By Kwun Ho Ngan, Saman Sadeghi Afgeh, Joe Townsend, Artur d'Avila Garcez

Contrastive vision-language learning with paraphrasing and negation

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2511. 16527v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Contrastive vision-language models continue to be the dominant approach for image-text retrieval.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
4d ago

One Geometry, Different Outcomes: Readout-Dependent Effects of the Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models

The paper investigates how the modality gap— the separation between image and text representations in contrastive vision‑language models—affects different downstream tasks. By showing that a single dominant direction accounts for most of the image‑text mean separation, the authors explain why reducing or removing this gap can improve zero‑shot classification, degrade retrieval, or restore performance depending on the task. The study provides a geometric framework that clarifies when and why gap interventions should be applied in vision‑language systems.

By Aditya Sharma, Divya Saxena
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Which Negatives Matter? Ask Your Text Encoder: Adaptive Similarity Margins for Dense-Caption Retrieval

The paper introduces HN-CLIP, a new objective for dense-caption retrieval that adapts similarity margins per negative example using the text encoder’s own geometry. By adding a detached caption‑similarity matrix to the negative logits, HN‑CLIP addresses the issue of near‑duplicate captions that cause premature loss saturation in InfoNCE training. Experiments on four benchmarks show that HN‑CLIP outperforms leading methods by 2.4–4.3 R@1, trains 2.4× faster than GOAL and 5.4× faster than StructXLIP, and achieves the best full‑data baseline with only 20% of the training data.

By Haoyue Liu, Ye Chen, Zhichao Wang, Xiaoying Tang
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Subspace Alignment for Vision-Language Model Test-time Adaptation

The paper introduces SubTTA, a test-time adaptation method for vision‑language models that aligns the semantic subspaces of visual and textual modalities to improve zero‑shot predictions. It addresses two issues: the modality gap caused by distribution shifts and visual nuisance that masks task‑specific semantics. By minimizing chordal distance between principal subspaces and projecting visual features onto a task‑specific textual subspace, SubTTA refines decision boundaries and achieves an average 2.24% improvement over existing TTA methods.

By Zhichen Zeng, Wenxuan Bao, Xiao Lin, Ruizhong Qiu, Tianxin Wei, Xuying Ning, Yuchen Yan, Chen Luo, Monica Xiao Cheng, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong