arXiv:2605.01048v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Counterfactual prompting (i.e., perturbing a single factor and measuring output change) is widely used to evaluate things like LLM bias and C...
By Zihao Yang, Mosh Levy, Yoav Goldberg, Byron C. Wallace
GLoC-EHR is a multimodal language model that processes electronic health records by combining a fixed-size global memory of the entire patient trajectory with a local memory of selected events. It generates hospital-course summaries and masked concept descriptions, then is fine‑tuned to cite evidence before answering clinical questions, using group relative policy optimization to reward correct, evidence‑supported responses. On MIMIC‑IV outcome tasks, GLoC‑EHR achieves the highest macro AUROC among compared models when answering directly, and maintains strong performance with evidence‑cited reasoning while adding distinct supported findings from the local memory.
By Chaiho Shin, Kwangsoo Kim
The paper introduces Causal-Counterfactual RAG, a new framework that augments Retrieval-Augmented Generation with explicit causal graphs and counterfactual reasoning. By incorporating cause‑effect relationships into retrieval and evaluating both direct causal evidence and counterfactual scenarios, the approach aims to produce more robust, accurate, and interpretable answers. This method seeks to maintain contextual coherence, reduce hallucinations, and improve reasoning fidelity compared to traditional RAG systems.
By Harshad Khadilkar, Abhay Gupta
iFlip is an iterative refinement method for generating counterfactual examples using large language models. It incorporates three feedback types—model confidence, feature attribution, and natural language—to guide successive edits. Experiments show iFlip outperforms five state‑of‑the‑art baselines, achieving a 57.8% higher validity rate and improving model performance through counterfactual data augmentation.
By Yilong Wang, Qianli Wang, Nils Feldhus
The paper discusses how large language models (LLMs) can be fine‑tuned with observational data to improve alignment with human preferences and business goals. It highlights that directly using such data can cause models to learn spurious correlations, and introduces DeconfoundLM, a method that removes known confounders from reward signals. Experiments show that DeconfoundLM better recovers causal relationships and outperforms baseline methods by over 16% in objective score when confounding is present.
By Erfan Loghmani
arXiv:2606. 00467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for zero-shot annotation and LLM-as-a-judge tasks, yet their reliability hinges on how model-internalized priors interact with user-provided instructions.
By Etienne Casanova, Rafal Kocielnik, R. Michael Alvarez