arXiv:2609.37798v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Speech self-supervised learning aims to learn general-purpose representations for downstream speech tasks. However, current approaches rely on comple...
By Gaspard Bott\'e, S\'everin Baroudi, Samir Sadok, Francesco Paissan, Thomas Hueber, Xavier Alameda-Pineda, Ricard Marxer, Mirco Ravanelli
arXiv:2606. 28953v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Poisoning attacks entail attackers intentionally tampering with training data.
By Thomas Thebaud, Sonal Joshi, Henry Li, Martin Sustek, Jesus Villalba, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Najim Dehak
arXiv:2609.39162v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Speaker diarization systems based on speaker embeddings and neural diarization exploit complementary forms of speaker information, but their intermed...
By Yehoshua Dissen, Joseph Keshet, Eduard Golshtein
arXiv:2607. 21820v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detectors are trained to distinguish genuine speech from synthetic speech and often perform well on standard benchmarks.
By Daniyal Kabir Dar, Arun Ross
The paper presents BiMamba2, a 47.88‑million‑parameter bidirectional Mamba‑2 encoder trained with masked discrete‑unit prediction for multilingual speech representation. It was trained on 250 hours of unlabeled speech from 67 languages and evaluated in the Unsupervised Speech in the Wild Challenge, achieving an Adjusted Rand Index of 0.735 for speaker clustering while reporting lower performance on language identification and character error rate compared to supervised baselines. The authors also discuss a discrepancy between local‑official metric scales and checkpoint rankings, underscoring the limits of in‑distribution diagnostics for predicting Dynabench probe outcomes.
By Prakriti Subedi, Howard Prioleau, Saurav K Aryal
The paper introduces asymmetric classifier‑free guidance (CFG) for target‑speaker ASR using Whisper, where a speaker‑conditioned branch predicts the target transcript and a speaker‑unconditioned branch predicts serialized multi‑speaker transcripts. CFG modulates the influence of speaker conditioning during decoding via a single guidance scale, which is first set globally on development data and then refined per utterance by a lightweight encoder‑based predictor while keeping the recognition model fixed. The resulting system yields up to 21.8% relative WER reduction over a condition‑only baseline and 5.6% over standard conditional decoding under domain shifts.
By Yiwen Guan, Jacob Whitehill