arXiv AI By Licheng Pan, Haocheng Yang, Yuzhou Chen, Yichen Sun, Yuan Lu, Yunfei Teng, Jiajun Fan, Guangyi Liu, Zhixuan Chu, Hao Wang

CleanRM: Reward Modeling from Noisy Feedback with a Few Clean Feedback for RLHF

Read the original on arXiv AI →

CleanRM is a reward‑modeling approach that mitigates the bias caused by noisy preference data in RLHF. It calibrates sample‑wise noise ratios using a small set of clean feedback via optimal transport, aligning the joint distribution of noisy and clean preferences. The method then trains a reward model with a noise‑corrected surrogate loss, proven to be unbiased with respect to the clean risk, and outperforms existing denoising baselines in experiments.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 30

Diffusion Reward Models

arXiv:2609.33803v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models underpin the alignment of large language models, yet the dominant designs reduce each prompt--response pair to a point estimate...

By Xiangyang Wang, Bingxiang He, Zeyuan Liu, Jiaze Wang, Ziqing Qiao, Yuxin Zuo, Huan-ang Gao, Cheng Qian, Wenbin Zhang, Ran Li, Youbang Sun, Ning Ding, Yuanchun Shi, Zhiyuan Liu, Chaojun Xiao, Chun Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

Latent Reward Registers for Diffusion Preference Alignment

arXiv:2608. 03929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning diffusion models with human preferences usually relies on a sparse terminal reward evaluated on the final generated samples, presenting a severe temporal credit-assignment challenge across the multi-step denoising process.

By Yuanshen Guan, Zipeng Feng, Zhiwei Xiong, Peiqin Sun
arXiv AI
5d ago

Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment

The paper introduces Collaborative Reward Modeling (CRM), an online framework that uses cross-model peer review and curriculum learning to identify reliable preference pairs for training reward models (RMs). By having two RMs evaluate each other's sample selections and synchronizing their learning progress, CRM reduces the impact of noisy feedback, improving RM generalization by up to 9.94 points on RewardBench under 40% preference noise. The approach also extends to implicit-reward alignment, demonstrating robustness and broad applicability for learning from imperfect feedback.

By Jiazheng Zhang, Wenqing Jing, Zizhuo Zhang, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Rongxiang Weng, Jiahuan Li, Jingang Wang, Mingxu Chai, Shibo Hong, Yuming Yang, Chenhao Huang, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang