arXiv Computer Vision By Novanto Yudistira, Muhammad Dzaka Aufa Fadhillah, Irawati Nurmala Sari

Class-Grounded Batik Captioning under Scarce Text Annotation: Label Retention and Source-Specific Error Propagation

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper presents a batik-captioning system that uses class labels as compact supervision when expert text annotations are scarce. It combines a LoRA‑adapted DINOv2 classifier with a Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B captioner, both loaded in 4‑bit NF4, and evaluates three captioner conditions across 150 images, achieving a 0.9067 ground‑truth class‑label mention rate. The classifier attains 96.10% pooled accuracy, with higher performance on public‑source images (98.33%) than on local images (75.76%), and the study highlights how class conditioning preserves label information while also propagating classification errors into fluent captions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 26

MiD-VLM: Detecting and Grounding Global Semantic Misinformation in Image-Caption Pairs

MiD-VLM is a multimodal model that detects and grounds global semantic misinformation in image-caption pairs. It combines image-text representations from SigLIP with visual scene features from DINOv2, and adapts Qwen2‑VL‑7B using LoRA to jointly predict authenticity, identify manipulation type, and localize misleading caption tokens. On the DGM4+ validation split, it achieves an F1 score of 0.9679 for binary authenticity classification.

By Tarunya Prasad, Bharatesh Chakravarthi
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 5

DEPICT: Scoring Text-to-Image Alignment by Answer Agreement

DEPICT is a new training‑free metric for evaluating text‑to‑image alignment. It replaces fixed reference answers with an agreement rule that compares image‑based and caption‑only responses, weighting questions by how decisively the caption determines them. By merging this agreement score with a holistic score, DEPICT improves negation accuracy dramatically and outperforms existing training‑free metrics while matching or exceeding fine‑tuned evaluators on several benchmarks.

By Vasco Ramos, Sandra Godinho Silva, Joao Magalhaes, Ricardo Rei, Pedro Henrique Martins
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Redemption Score: A Multi-Modal Evaluation Framework for Image Captioning via Distributional, Perceptual, and Linguistic Signal Triangulation

The paper introduces Redemption Score (RS), a multi‑modal evaluation framework for image captioning that combines three complementary signals: Mutual Information Divergence for global image‑text alignment, DINO‑based perceptual similarity of cycle‑generated images for visual grounding, and LLM text embeddings for contextual similarity to human references. RS fuses these signals to provide a more holistic assessment, achieving a Kendall‑τ of 58.42 on Flickr8k and outperforming most prior methods. The framework demonstrates consistent performance across Conceptual Captions and MS COCO, offering a robust evaluation that captures both visual accuracy and text quality.

By Ashim Dahal, Ankit Ghimire, Saydul Akbar Murad, Nick Rahimi
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 23

Where Do Long Captions Fail? Position-Aware Diagnosis and Reinforcement Learning for Detailed Image Captioning

The paper introduces a position‑aware rubric that breaks down long image captions into atomic visual claims, allowing verification of generated text against these claims and revealing distinct failure modes: unsupported specificity in the middle and vague language at the end. Using this diagnosis, the authors propose PAGER, a reinforcement learning objective that provides separate rewards for middle evidence, tail continuation, claim coverage, and length control. Experiments on detailed‑caption benchmarks show that PAGER improves position‑wise grounding and pairwise caption preference while maintaining overall caption quality.

By Yuanze Hu, Zhichao Yang, Junwei Jing, Xin Yang, Wenxuan Liu, Tinghai Zhang, Jia Fu, Hongzhi Zhang, Xiangyu Wu, Ruiming Tang, Tingting Gao, Han Li