arXiv AI By Xinzhe Wang, Xudong Weng, Zang Li, Shaolei Zhang

Charts as Epistemic Actions for Experience-Driven Agentic Data Analysis

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2610. 30072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data agents built on ReAct-style loops now execute complex analytical workflows over structured data, yet their intermediate reasoning still runs almost entirely through text.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

AdaLens: Interactive Storyline for Monitoring and Steering Long-Running Agentic Data Analysis

AdaLens is an interactive system designed to monitor and steer long-running, autonomous data analysis workflows powered by large language models. It provides a storyline-based interface that unifies analytical plans, execution progress, intermediate findings, and data-column involvement, enabling analysts to observe evolving reasoning and evidence. The system also offers steering interactions that allow users to redirect low-value directions or deepen promising ones during execution.

By Yangtian Liu, Yan Miao, Shuhan Liu, Yunfan Zhou, Dae Hyun Kim, Di Weng, Yingcai Wu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22

Monitorable Chart Reasoning Agents via Verifiable Process Rewards

The paper introduces Chart‑RVR, a reinforcement‑learning framework that trains chart‑reasoning agents to produce monitorable, verifiable outputs. It decomposes reasoning into three auditable stages—Structure, Evidence, and Derivation—allowing stakeholders to trace how the model reads the chart, extracts data, and computes the answer. Experiments on six benchmarks show that Chart‑RVR matches or exceeds state‑of‑the‑art accuracy while delivering rationales that are far more verifiable and evidence‑grounded than existing methods.

By Sanchit Sinha, Oana Frunza, Kashif Rasul, Aidong Zhang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for LLM Agents

The paper introduces the Procedural Graph, a framework that structures procedural knowledge into (procedure, relation, procedure) triplets to guide large language model agents in planning and tool usage. At each decision point, a guidance model uses the local subgraph to bias the agent’s next action, while an LLM refiner self‑evolves the graph by editing its topology based on successful versus failed trajectories. Experiments across datasets and LLMs show that Procedural Graphs consistently outperform memory‑based baselines, and the self‑evolution mechanism further improves performance without manual engineering.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for LLM Agents

The paper introduces Procedural Graphs, a framework that structures procedural knowledge for large language model agents as (procedure, relation, procedure) triplets, analogous to knowledge graphs for factual data. At each decision point, a guidance model uses the local subgraph to bias the agent’s next action, while an LLM refiner self‑evolves the graph by comparing failed and successful trajectories, editing its topology to improve performance. Experiments across various datasets, tasks, and LLMs show that Procedural Graphs consistently outperform memory‑based baselines, and the self‑evolution mechanism further enhances results without manual engineering.

By Yuxing Lu, Yicheng Chen, Shanchan Wu, Sercan \"{O}. Ar{\i}k