The paper presents a new taxonomy for online harm on video platforms, expanding existing frameworks to multimodal contexts and defining six content-based categories: Information, Hate and harassment, Addictive, Clickbait, Sexual, and Physical harms. It also evaluates multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as alternative annotators, comparing GPT‑4‑Turbo, non‑trained crowdworkers, and trained human annotators on a dataset of 19,422 potentially harmful YouTube videos. The study finds that MLLMs can perform comparably to human annotators in both binary and multi‑label classification tasks, suggesting potential applications in content moderation and social science research.
By Claire Wonjeong Jo, Miki Weso{\l}owska, Magdalena Wojcieszak
arXiv:2606. 09700v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-powered content moderation systems have become a critical defense against harmful online content.
By Qin Yang, Lu Malloy, Joshua Lee, Xiaohan Chang, Meisam Mohammady, Doowon Kim, Yuan Hong
The paper introduces Bot‑Mod, a moderation framework that detects malicious intent in multi‑agent systems by interrogating agents with diagnostic probes and updating a Bayesian posterior over candidate intents. Bot‑Mod starts with a content‑only prior and refines its inference using moderator‑assigned likelihoods until a stopping criterion is reached. Evaluations on the Molt‑Intent dataset, an external social engineering dataset, and three agent LLMs show that Bot‑Mod outperforms content‑only moderators, a fine‑tuned classifier, and judge‑based interrogators, achieving higher F1 scores both in‑distribution and out‑of‑distribution.
By Ali Al-Lawati, Nafis Tripto, Abolfazl Ansari, Fali Wang, Jason Lucas, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee
EvoHarmBench is a dynamic adversarial evaluation framework that simulates how users iteratively modify harmful content to evade moderation. It uses an optimization loop that evolves evasion strategies at the semantic-cluster level while maintaining human readability, and tests 229 semantic sub-clusters across five violation categories derived from 5,002 real-world adversarial samples. The study shows that even state‑of‑the‑art LLM‑based moderators can be bypassed with an 80.3% success rate after twelve iterations, highlighting significant vulnerabilities in current systems.
By Ruijie Jian, Benlei Cui, Ting Ma, Haidong Ding, Kangwei Liu, Ziwen Xu, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue, Ziqiang Zhu, Junjie Li, Haiwen Hong
arXiv:2609.22696v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Decentralized social media platforms create new opportunities and challenges for computational mental health research because data access, moderation,...
By Gaurab Chhetri, Anandi Dutta, Subasish Das
The study audits hate‑speech moderation on Twitter (now X) using 540,000 annotated tweets from a full day. Eighty percent of hateful tweets, including violent content, remained online after five months, and removal was only slightly more likely than for non‑hateful tweets, far below the rates for scams or adult content. Automated detection could not reliably classify hate but ranked it highly, allowing human triage; however, current staffing curbed little exposure, while substantial reductions were financially feasible and far below applicable regulatory fines.
By Manuel Tonneau, Dylan Thurgood, Diyi Liu, Niyati Malhotra, Victor Orozco-Olvera, Ralph Schroeder, Scott A. Hale, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Paul R\"ottger, Samuel P. Fraiberger