arXiv Machine Learning August 14, 2026 By Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Leonardo Christov Moore, Gustav Sir, Martin Krutsky

"Cause" is Mechanistic Narrative within Scientific Domains: An Ordinary Language Philosophical Critique of "Causal Machine Learning"

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2501. 05844v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Causal Learning has emerged as a major theme of research in statistics and machine learning in recent years, promising computational techniques to reveal ``true'' causality.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI

Jul 15

Solution of the Hempel's statistical ambiguity problem and Causal AI

arXiv:2607. 12826v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses Carl Hempel's longstanding problem of statistical ambiguity in inductive-statistical inference, in which contradictory predictions are derived from statistical laws.

By Evgenii Vityaev

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jul 14

Solution of the Hempel's statistical ambiguity problem and Causal AI

This paper addresses Carl Hempel's longstanding problem of statistical ambiguity in inductive-statistical inference, in which contradictory predictions are derived from statistical laws. To avoid such predictions, Carl Hempel proposed the Requirement of Maximal Specificity (RMS) for the statistical laws used in the inference.

arXiv AI

Sep 2

EvoSCM: Scientific Belief Revision Through Causal Model Evolution and Experimentation

arXiv:2609.01526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific agents must learn not only how to reason, but also what to believe. However, existing LLM agents typically express scientific hypotheses in...

By Qing Zhao, Haowei Li, Weijian Deng, Pengxu Wei, Liang Lin

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Sep 7

Evidence Integration in Large Language Models

The paper proposes a distributional theory explaining how large language models (LLMs) incorporate external evidence into their decision-making process. It identifies three key predictions: (1) evidence is more persuasive when it aligns with the model’s prior beliefs, (2) models more readily accept errors from their own internal processes than from external sources, and (3) the same evidence can improve weaker models while harming stronger ones. Extensive experiments across ten million trials, twelve LLMs from four families, and eight domains—including quantum mechanics, physics, genetics, and molecular biology—confirm these predictions and reveal that evidence integration occurs late in the network as a structured sequence of steps rather than through a simple trust metric.

By Sebastien Kawada, Manolis Kellis

llms rag agents

arXiv AI

Jul 24

DN-Hypo-Pipeline: An AI-Driven Workflow for Generating Hypotheses using Large Language Models and Scientific Explanations

arXiv:2606. 08532v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern artificial intelligence excels at prediction but cannot explain.

By Lei Lin, Xinlong Pan, Ronghao Wang, Chunbao Zhou, Jue Wang, Yangang Wang, Ivana Rasovska

llms

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jun 23

An Introduction to Causal Reinforcement Learning

Causal inference provides a set of principles and tools that allow one to combine data and knowledge about an environment to reason with questions of counterfactual nature, i. e.

agents reinforcement-learning

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

Solution of the Hempel's statistical ambiguity problem and Causal AI

Solution of the Hempel's statistical ambiguity problem and Causal AI

EvoSCM: Scientific Belief Revision Through Causal Model Evolution and Experimentation

Evidence Integration in Large Language Models

DN-Hypo-Pipeline: An AI-Driven Workflow for Generating Hypotheses using Large Language Models and Scientific Explanations

An Introduction to Causal Reinforcement Learning