The paper introduces a weakly supervised framework for extracting dataset mentions from forced displacement and Fragile, Conflict, and Violence (FCV) documents. It uses a lightweight model trained on general research literature to generate candidate mentions, which are then refined by a large language model that validates or rejects them and corrects boundaries. The refined annotations are augmented with synthetic and contrastive examples to fine‑tune the model, achieving 74.1% precision and 70.5% recall on a benchmark of 1,706 passages, with higher precision (89.5%) on passages that contain dataset references.
By Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio, Patrick Michael Brock, Olivier Dupriez
The paper introduces a pipeline that merges structured disaster records from EM‑DAT with unstructured documents from ReliefWeb and the European Media Monitor to generate source‑grounded disaster storylines and causal knowledge graphs. Using Retrieval‑Augmented Generation, it produces tabular event profiles covering 17 fields and builds causal graphs enriched with citation‑grounded explanatory narratives, allowing traceability to primary sources. Human evaluation across three crisis cases shows high retrieval precision, strong faithfulness of causal relations, and a clear expert preference for citation‑grounded components over ungrounded ones.
By Ivan Decostanzi, Michele Ronco, Sergio Consoli, Christina Corbane, Lorenzo Bertolini, Indaco Biazzo, Daria Mihaila, Manuel Garcia-Herranz, Felix Schwebel, Yelena Mejova, Kyriaki Kalimeri
ConstructCIE is a manually annotated dataset designed for extracting causal information from OSHA construction accident reports. It employs a hierarchical schema that categorizes accident types, causal factors, sub‑causal factors, and the supporting evidence spans. Experiments with supervised sequence taggers and instruction‑tuned large language models show strong performance on accident‑type prediction and broad causal recovery, yet precise span‑level extraction remains challenging, highlighting the need for better domain grounding and evidence extraction.
By Hung Nguyen, Jaehoon Lee, Namgyun Kim, Kuan-Hao Huang
The paper "Medical Causal Hypothesis Verification with Large Language Models" reports a small-scale study evaluating eight LLMs on 17 medical causal hypotheses. The authors introduce an evaluation framework and annotate 1,067 evidence points across six criteria, using nine metrics to assess performance. Results show that while LLMs have strong recall, they frequently fail to provide valid scientific articles, evidence, or reject unsupported hypotheses, revealing a critical limitation for their use in healthcare.
By Safiyyah Ahmed, Abrar Ansari, Md Aminul Islam, Elena Zheleva
The paper presents a system for the IEEE BigData 2026 Cup on Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment on Social Media. It tackles three tasks—risk-level classification, evidence phrase extraction, and multi-label factor identification—using Qwen2.5-Instruct models adapted with quantized low-rank adaptation (QLoRA) and an answer-masked causal language-model objective. The final system achieved a composite score of 0.7738, with 0.8089 on Task 1 and 0.6919 on Task 2, demonstrating that task‑specific training and tailored aggregation improve performance across the three tasks.
By Xuan Zhong Feng, Geoffrey Martin, Hexin Dong, Yifan Peng
arXiv:2602. 06337v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Causal inference is essential for decision-making but remains challenging for non-experts.
By Junqi Chen, Sirui Chen, Chaochao Lu