Cascading Bandits with Noisy Observations: Algorithms and Regret Bounds
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2602.10727v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Rising Multi-Armed Bandits (RMABs) model sequential decision problems where each arm's expected reward improves with repeated pulls. In such proble...
arXiv:2606. 01799v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study $N$-armed stochastic dueling bandits under the Condorcet-winner assumption, where three widely adopted objectives are considered: best-arm identification (BAI), weak regret, and strong regret.
arXiv:2606. 09002v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study a stochastic multi-armed bandit problem in which the set of available arms expands over time.
The paper introduces Persistent Candidate LinUCB (PC‑LinUCB), a variant of the LinUCB algorithm for linear bandits that reduces per‑round score evaluations from ≥×K to ≥×(k+q) by maintaining a small set of active actions and sampling challengers from the remaining actions. It provides high‑probability regret bounds that include a standard learning term and an additive discovery cost of order ≥×((K-k)×log(K-k))/q, which does not grow with the horizon. Experiments demonstrate that PC‑LinUCB accelerates LinUCB while keeping regret comparable, and the persistent candidate approach can be applied beyond LinUCB.
arXiv:2609.37932v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Systems operating in dynamic environments require timely updates to sustain performance. For resource-intensive systems such as machine learning models...
The paper studies the trade‑off between maximizing rewards and accurately estimating current treatment effects in nonstationary multi‑armed bandits. For $K$‑armed bandits with H"older‑smooth mean rewards, the authors derive minimax bounds on expected dynamic regret under a high‑probability simultaneous coverage requirement for all current effects. They propose the TRACE algorithm, which achieves a regret–precision trade‑off that separates reward‑learning regret from the unavoidable cost of refreshing current‑effect estimates, and extend the method with an empirical‑Bernstein e‑process to adapt exploration while preserving worst‑case guarantees.