arXiv:2609.13611v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT...
By Diptesh Kanojia, Chi-kiu Lo, Archchana Sindhujan, Samuel Larkin, Greg Hanneman, Alon Lavie
arXiv:2610.35423v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Operator manuals of agricultural implements are delivered in many languages, and the standards require that competent persons review every translation,...
By Timo Oksanen
arXiv:2608.28626v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate peer reviews, prompting examination of their capacity for critical evaluation. This st...
By Emad Alharbi
arXiv:2606.26040v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: AI translation of literary works is increasingly common. While the content may be rendered adequately, we do not know enough about how readers expe...
By Yves Ferstler, Adam Podoxin, Ty Brassington, Ga\"elle Laperri\`ere, Roman Grundkiewicz, Marie-Jean Meurs, Maite Taboada, Marzena Karpinska
COMET reports translation quality as a single number, and that number is routinely compared across target languages written in different scripts. Such a comparison assumes Script Invariance: the score...
arXiv:2610.33749v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As machine translation systems approach human-level quality, traditional evaluation methodologies struggle to detect subtle translation errors. We crit...
By Dmitry Popov, Vladislav Negodin, Ekaterina Enikeeva, Iana Matrosova, Nikolay Karpachev, Max Ryabinin