arXiv Computer Vision By Shaheer U. Saeed, Zion Tse, Gregory Slabaugh, Daniel C. Alexander, Yipeng Hu

Can machines reason non-verbally?

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper "Can machines reason non-verbally?" argues that current AI systems, including DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Gemini, struggle with visual non-verbal reasoning tasks such as completing abstract patterns or delineating ambiguous regions. It introduces GenVerOpt, a framework that combines generation, verification, and optimisation to enable per-sample reasoning, mirroring human problem-solving. Experiments show GenVerOpt surpasses humans on abstract IQ puzzles, matches clinicians in prostate cancer segmentation, outperforms experts in liver vessel reconstruction, and beats state-of-the-art methods in tumour boundary alignment.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv AI
Jul 1

Evo-PI: Aligning Medical Reasoning via Evolving Principle-Guided Supervision

arXiv:2606. 31800v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite recent progress, the reasoning capabilities of large multimodal language models (MLLMs) remain fundamentally constrained by static supervision, where fixed prompts, rules, or reward models provide non-adaptive guidance throughout training.

By Xianda Zheng, Huan Gao, Meng-Fen Chiang, Michael Witbrock, Kaiqi Zhao, Shangyang Li
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications

The paper reviews how Large Language Models (LLMs) are being adapted for medical reasoning, moving beyond single-step answers to systems that can systematically, transparently, and verifiably reason. It introduces a taxonomy of enhancement techniques, split into training-time methods such as supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning, and test-time methods like prompt engineering and multi‑agent systems. The review examines their application across text, image, and code modalities in key clinical areas—diagnosis, education, and treatment planning—and tracks the shift in evaluation benchmarks from simple accuracy to more nuanced assessments of reasoning quality and visual interpretability.

By Zizhan Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Meidan Ding, Shiyi Zheng, Shengyuan Liu, Jie Liu, Jiaming Ji, Linlin Shen, Yixuan Yuan, Wenting Chen