Can deep learning translate physical fields governed by fundamentally different equations? We address this question by introducing Cross-Physics Mapping (CPM), an operator-learning framework for mappi...
arXiv:2605. 08318v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the problem of \emph{architecture selection} for deep learning models trained to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), asking when transformer-based architectures with learned attention outperform Fourier-domain neural operators.
By Brandon Yee, Pairie Koh, Jack Rodriguez, Mihir Tekal
arXiv:2510. 25306v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial physical knowledge--governing structures known, constitutive relations or their combinations not--pervades spatiotemporal systems.
By Xizhe Wang, Xiaobin Song, Hongbo Zhao, Qingshan Jia, Qianchuan Zhao, Hao Sun, Benben Jiang
arXiv:2606. 11963v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators provide a powerful framework for learning solution mappings of partial differential equations directly in function space.
By Mostafa Bamdad, Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Timon Rabczuk
The paper investigates how different attention mechanisms affect the performance of DeepONet neural operators. Five variants—varying in cross‑attention, self‑attention, tokenization, and attention depth—are trained in both data‑driven and physics‑informed settings on one‑ and two‑dimensional PDE benchmarks. Results show that per‑sensor tokenization with cross‑attention consistently reduces error, while branch self‑attention helps only in complex spatial problems, and deeper cross‑attention yields diminishing returns with higher cost.
By Amar Alem Koric, Qibang Liu, Seid Koric
arXiv:2607. 22215v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this study, we introduce latent PDE mapping, a broadly applicable physics-informed learning technique designed to enable efficient geometric generalization with sparse training data.
By Ingvild Askim Adde, Mary M. Maleckar, Gabriel Balaban