arXiv Computation and Language By Marek \v{S}uppa, Ivan Vykopal, Jaroslav Kop\v{c}an

Can an Agent Debug a Web Corpus? Agentic Auditing of Slovak FineWeb2

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper presents a novel approach to debugging multilingual web corpora by employing a large language model (LLM) as a tool-using agent rather than a classifier. Using this agent on the Slovak portion of FineWeb2, the authors identified seven distinct failure modes, including a large machine‑generated content farm that bypassed pipeline filters. The resulting test suite can scan the entire corpus in under a second without GPU resources, offering precise prevalence estimates and actionable insights into pipeline shortcomings.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
4d ago

Can an Agent Debug a Web Corpus? Agentic Auditing of Slovak FineWeb2

The paper investigates how a large language model can act as a corpus debugger for the Slovak portion of the multilingual FineWeb2 dataset. By using a tool‑using agent that explores the corpus via a read‑only, budgeted API, the authors identified seven issues across four phenomena, including a large machine‑generated content farm that slipped through the pipeline’s filters. The agent’s compiled test suite can scan the entire 26.5 M‑document corpus in 0.7 s without a GPU, providing precise prevalence estimates and actionable insights into pipeline failures.

arXiv AI
Oct 19

Explore Separately, Adopt Selectively: Execution-Guided Tool Use over Large Tool Libraries

The paper introduces BRIA (BRanch-Inspect-Adopt), an agent that isolates tool‑candidate investigations into separate branches, executing each candidate independently and then inspecting the execution evidence to adopt only useful results. BRIA dynamically retrieves additional tools as new needs arise during task execution and is evaluated on PlanBench‑XL and MCP‑Atlas with a library of 1,897 tools, outperforming or matching the strongest retrieval baselines. On MCP‑Atlas, BRIA achieves an average claim score of 89.77 versus 75.40 for MCP‑Zero, and it lies on the Pareto frontier for task performance and input‑token cost.

By Anna Mazhar, Seiji Maekawa, Nikita Bhutani