arXiv Computer Vision
Calibrate What You SHIP: Post-Selection Risk Control for Verifier-Guided Text-to-Image Generation
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 8
PolicyShiftGuard: Benchmarking and Improving Policy-Adaptive Image Guardrails
arXiv:2607. 05910v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Image guardrails are typically trained and evaluated under a fixed safety policy, implicitly treating safety as an intrinsic property of an image.
arXiv AI
Jun 30
Budgeted Act-or-Defer Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation with Local Reliability Bounds
arXiv:2606. 29654v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent deliberation among LLMs can improve reasoning, but deployment requires deciding when the current answer is reliable enough to act on and when it should be escalated to human review.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 18
Guaranteed Adaptive Modality Acquisition: When the Policy Chooses Its Own Calibration Group
arXiv:2608. 15520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A multimodal system may begin inference holding only some of its inputs and may acquire the rest at a cost.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 3
MARGIN: Runtime Confidence Calibration for Multi-Agent Foundation Model Coordination
arXiv:2605. 22949v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Foundation-model pools are increasingly used as black-box responders in coordinated systems where a coordinator must decide which response to trust.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 19
Judging to Improve: A De-biased VLM-as-3D-Judge Protocol for Single-Image 3D Generation
arXiv:2606. 20364v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A companion study established a de-biased, cross-model VLM-as-3D-judge that reliably ranks single-image-to-3D mesh quality where cheap geometry and CLIP proxies fall short.
arXiv Computer Vision
1d ago
SafeRestore: Detector-Relative Risk Certificates for Selective Industrial Image Restoration
SafeRestore introduces a framework for certifying when an industrial image restoration should be automatically returned to a detector or require human review. It ranks five restoration candidates using action‑specific fitted scores, selects a threshold gate on tuning data, and evaluates the gate on a separate certification sample with two one‑sided exact binomial bounds—one for evidence‑loss incidents and one for excess‑activation incidents. In a retrospective study of 4,591 Carinthia‑S images, the protocol demonstrates auditable risk‑coverage behavior, with varying pass rates across different policies and morphologies.