arXiv Computer Vision
Blueprint2CAD: Benchmarking Foundation Models on Engineering Drawing-to-CAD Render Correspondence
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 19
CADBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for AI-Assisted CAD Program Generation
arXiv:2605. 10873v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recovering editable CAD programs from images or 3D observations is central to AI-assisted design, but progress is difficult to measure because existing evaluations are fragmented across datasets, modalities, and metrics.
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9
Look Where You Can: Active View Selection for CAD Reconstruction under Occlusion
The paper introduces SightCAD, a framework for parametric CAD reconstruction that explicitly handles view feasibility constraints in realistic indoor scenes. It learns a view selector to choose a small set of feasible viewpoints for a vision‑language model that generates executable CadQuery code, and jointly trains the selector and the VLM using a reward that depends on the final geometric fidelity. The approach outperforms baseline methods on several benchmarks, achieving higher intersection‑over‑union scores and a lower invalid‑code rate.
arXiv AI
Jul 8
Foundation Models for Automatic CAD Generation
arXiv:2607. 05573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) enable the automatic generation of parametric 3D designs from natural-language specifications.
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 2
Separating perception from reasoning in vision-language models: a model-free render ceiling for crystal structures
arXiv:2609.00663v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal evaluations cannot say whether a vision-language model misread an image or misreasoned about it, because every existing method for separatin...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4
RealCADBench: Benchmarking Parametric CAD Modeling from Industrial Design Intents
RealCADBench is a new benchmark for evaluating intent‑to‑program parametric CAD modeling, featuring 12,632 tasks drawn from 19 factory‑automation categories and covering text, 2D drawings, product photos, and rendered images for both Part and Assembly modeling. The study reports results on a 1,770‑task evaluation slice, using metrics such as executability, Solid IoU, Surface IoU, and a rubric‑based visual‑semantic identity Judge. Across nine standalone and six frontier‑scale large models, no single model dominates all four metrics, highlighting diverse strengths and failure modes like missing fine structures and incorrect assembly placement.
arXiv AI
Jun 6
MUSE: Benchmarking Manufacturable, Functional, and Assemblable Text-to-CAD Generation
arXiv:2605. 28579v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced text-driven 3D generation, yet Text-to-CAD remains far from supporting industrial product design.