Beyond Similarity: Foundation Models as an Efficient Backbone for Training-Free Composed Video Retrieval
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2607. 25266v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled long-form video understanding at a scale that was not previously possible.
arXiv:2607. 00446v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As video corpora continue to expand in both scale and task complexity, there is increasing demand for approaches that retrieve relevant videos from large-scale corpora (inter-video reasoning) and subsequently perform fine-grained, query-conditioned tasks (intra-video reasoning) within the retrieved content, such as temporal grounding.
arXiv:2609.37426v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising results in long-video understanding due to the rich semantic information they can capture....
The paper introduces CoVR‑R, a reason‑aware composed video retrieval system that, given a reference video and an edit instruction, retrieves a target video that satisfies the edit. It employs a zero‑shot reason‑then‑retrieve pipeline using Qwen3.5‑27B to generate structured descriptions and dense embeddings for gallery videos, and performs edit reasoning on the query to produce a target‑video description used as the query embedding. The method combines dense retrieval with a TF‑IDF branch over generated texts, fusing the rankings with split‑specific weights, achieving state‑of‑the‑art retrieval metrics on both validation and blind test splits.
The paper describes the CERTH-ITI team’s approach to the TRECVID 2025 Ad-hoc Video Search (AVS) and Video Question Answering (VQA) tracks. For AVS, a two-stage framework uses foundation vision‑language models for initial retrieval and a Multimodal‑LLM for reranking, improving contextual matching without training. In VQA, an audio‑visual MLLM is fine‑tuned and enhanced with inference‑time scaling; answer generation employs majority voting over responses from random frame subsets, while multiple‑choice responses use mean‑pooling logits, yielding top performance on VQA metrics.
arXiv:2607. 24794v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate superior generalization in fundamental video tasks, restricted context windows limit their long video understanding.