arXiv:2606. 04284v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Preference modeling plays a central role in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), enabling large language models (LLMs) to align with human values.
By Yifan Wang, Jinyi Mu, Mayank Jobanputra, Yu Wang, Ji-Ung Lee, Soyoung Oh, Isabel Valera, Vera Demberg
The paper introduces two token-error supervision methods for sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) large language models, aligning routing affinities with token-level cross-entropy loss. The first method predicts an error score per expert and uses it to adjust affinities before top‑K selection, while the second directly aligns router affinities to the model’s objective without extra heads or inference changes. Experiments on Granite and ARC‑Challenge show accuracy gains of about 2.3–2.94 percentage points over a parameter‑matched baseline, preserving the native sparse execution budget.
By Yury Nahshan, Nati Daniel, Jacob Goldberger, Yoli Shavit
arXiv:2604. 07343v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pluralistic alignment has emerged as a critical frontier in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), with reward models (RMs) serving as a central mechanism for capturing diverse human values.
By Qiyao Ma, Dechen Gao, Rui Cai, Boqi Zhao, Hanchu Zhou, Junshan Zhang, Zhe Zhao
arXiv:2609.33803v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Reward models underpin the alignment of large language models, yet the dominant designs reduce each prompt--response pair to a point estimate...
By Xiangyang Wang, Bingxiang He, Zeyuan Liu, Jiaze Wang, Ziqing Qiao, Yuxin Zuo, Huan-ang Gao, Cheng Qian, Wenbin Zhang, Ran Li, Youbang Sun, Ning Ding, Yuanchun Shi, Zhiyuan Liu, Chaojun Xiao, Chun Yu
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions. Existing evidence often conflates route coherence, candidate quality, and candidate-by-context interaction.
arXiv:2606. 02578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning ability, yet their reliability as automated evaluators remains limited by a critical weakness: when visual evidence conflicts with textual cues, MLLM judges tend to reward plausible narratives over perceptually correct answers.
By Seojeong Park, Jiho Choi, Junyong Kang, Seonho Lee, Jaeyo Shin, Hyunjung Shim