arXiv Computation and Language By Shaanil Punglia, Dadhichi Telwadkar, Vaibhav Rathore, Siddharth Sureka, Neha Bhargava

Beyond Accuracy: What Language-Subspace Interventions Capture, Remove, and Improve

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper investigates language‑subspace interventions designed to enhance multilingual reasoning by removing language‑related components from mid‑layer activations. Using MATH and MGSM datasets on four open‑weight LLMs, the authors examine whether these subspaces capture translation variation, whether projecting them out eliminates language information, and whether they improve accuracy without harming response language. Results show that the subspaces capture substantial translation variation but do not fully remove language signals, and that interventions can boost accuracy at the cost of language fidelity, highlighting the need to evaluate more than just accuracy.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Oct 12

The Evidence Anchoring Boundary: Where Visual Interventions Matter and When They Help in Multimodal LLMs

The paper investigates how visual interventions—training‑free edits applied to multimodal large language models—affect hallucinations and prediction quality. By applying a visual‑residual edit across successive decoder layers and matching its RMS strength, the authors identify an Evidence Anchoring Boundary (EAB) where the intervention’s influence drops sharply; effects before the EAB are 13.78–26.10× larger than after it. They further compare counterfactual subtraction across different question types and introduce calibrated selective routing, which only alters predictions when calibration supports an intervention, improving attribute accuracy by 1.56–1.81 percentage points while avoiding the harms of universal subtraction.

By Qiji Zhou, Junyi Hu, Peiyu Wang, Yue Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Rethinking the Multilingual Reasoning Gap with Layer Swap

The study investigates the performance gap between native-language reasoning and English-pivoted reasoning in large language models. By creating extensive multilingual reasoning datasets and fine‑tuning specialists on Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Base, the authors find that the native reasoning gap is much smaller (1.9–3.5%) than previously reported. They analyze weight‑space changes, discover a language‑agnostic reasoning core in the middle layers, and propose a Layer Swap technique that transfers these mid‑layer updates from an English specialist to native specialists, effectively closing most of the gap while maintaining native chain‑of‑thought output.

By Maxence Lasbordes, Am\'elie Chatelain, Djam\'e Seddah