arXiv AI By Aditya Sivakumar, Ashu Singhal, Nicholas Larus-Stone, Nithin Parsan

BenchBench-Protocol: Evaluating Real-World Wet-Lab Protocol Reasoning and Modification

Read the original on arXiv AI →

BenchBench-Protocol is a new benchmark for large language models that evaluates their ability to modify real-world wet‑lab protocols. It consists of 149 protocol‑modification tasks derived from actual changes scientists made to published protocols across 96 source protocols in nine wet‑lab biology domains. The benchmark includes weighted rubric elements for correct responses and has been reviewed by domain experts to ensure high quality.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

BenchBench-Cloning: Evaluating Molecular Cloning Design and Protocol Development

BenchBench‑Cloning is a new benchmark for evaluating large language models on end‑to‑end molecular cloning tasks. It contains 65 tasks drawn from real sequence records, laboratory notebooks, and published studies, split into 50 protocol‑development tasks and 15 construct‑design tasks. Performance is measured by simulation execution for protocols and deterministic or rubric‑based checks for design, with GPT‑6 Astra achieving the highest score of 30.6% among eight tested systems.

By Aditya Sivakumar, Peter Ciaccia, Hassaan Qadir, Ian Hsu, Ashu Singhal
arXiv AI
Oct 31

PAPERBENCHX: Can AI Reproduce Science Across Disciplines?

PAPERBENCHX is a new benchmark that tests whether AI can reproduce scientific experiments across 12 disciplines, including electromagnetics, photonics, chemistry, materials science, biology, and robotics. It consists of 93 expert-constructed tasks, each providing a source paper, a public specification, and a domain-native scientific environment. The benchmark evaluates AI agents by having them reconstruct, execute, and diagnose key experiments, then replay submissions from scratch to score regenerated evidence against expert-validated criteria, revealing that current AI configurations fully reproduce only 14% of tasks.

By Ruoyu Wu, Zengji Tu, Aolong Sun, Tianyi Ma, Junren Li, Xinbo Xu, Li Fu, Ziyan Zhang, Pinrui Huang, Xiaochen Wang, Chengda Wu, Yutao Zhou, Jianjun Wu, Lin Chang, Baobao Chang, Liang Chen, Kuan Li
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 26

SCI-AGENT-EXAM: Benchmarking Agents on Scientific Research Tasks

arXiv:2610.32441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of supporting scientific workflows, but their capabilities across diverse research activitie...

By Tianyun Zhong, Wei Wang, Jialin Li, Jianhong Tu, Liyao Li, Chuqiao Kuang, Tianshi Zheng, Songchi Zhou, Weiqi Zhai, Qile Jin, Jiajia Li, Jiasheng Zheng, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Shiwei Ye, Bing Zhao, Hu Wei, Lin Qu, Xianpei Han