arXiv Machine Learning By Liou Tang, James Joshi, Ashish Kundu

Behavioral Audit of Machine Unlearning Has a Privacy Cost

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 14518v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The removal of learned data from Machine Learning models through Machine Unlearning (MU) has been widely studied; however, there has yet to be an agreed-upon scheme for auditing MU.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Characterizing Privacy-Audit Alignment in Behavioral Audit of Machine Unlearning

The paper investigates the privacy risks inherent in auditing machine unlearning (MU) when the audit relies only on querying the model for behavioral signals. It shows that such generic audit schemes inevitably leak information about the retained data set, providing a geometric transfer theorem that bounds the distinguishability of retained set membership based on audit accuracy. The study also analyzes how the unlearned set, target sample, and query protocol influence the privacy‑audit transfer coefficient, with empirical evidence from both convex and non‑convex models supporting the theoretical findings.

By Liou Tang, James Joshi, Ashish Kundu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent

The paper investigates black-box privacy auditing for differentially private learning algorithms, focusing on DP‑SGD. It introduces a method that optimizes the auditor’s canary set using metagradient descent, improving empirical lower bounds on privacy parameters compared to prior canary designs. The approach is shown to be DP‑SGD agnostic and efficient, with optimized canaries for small models remaining effective for larger DP‑SGD models.

By Matteo Boglioni, Terrance Liu, Andrew Ilyas, Zhiwei Steven Wu