arXiv:2606. 26657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying high-utility candidates from massive discrete spaces under expensive evaluations is a recurring challenge across the sciences, with structure-based drug discovery as a prominent example.
By Mohammad Haddadnia, Yuvan Chali, Abhilash Jayaraj, Constance Kraay, Joana Reis, Felix Strieth-Kalthoff, Haribabu Arthanari
arXiv:2607. 12488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular optimization in drug discovery, materials design, and catalysis requires searching vast chemical spaces under tight evaluation budgets, since high-fidelity oracles and experimental measurements are costly.
By Sarina Kopf, Cristina Nevado, Philippe Schwaller
arXiv:2607. 23404v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-driving laboratories increasingly rely on multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) to balance cheap, approximate evaluations against scarce, expensive ones, with a predictive surrogate at its core.
By Jaewook Lee, Ethan Errington, Christian D. Lorenz, Miao Guo
arXiv:2608. 04113v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Black-box optimization is a ubiquitous problem in science and engineering, often dealing with expensive objective functions with cheaper lower-fidelity proxies available.
By Gustavo Sutter, Hao Wang, Luis Ricardez-Sandoval, Pascal Poupart, Agustinus Kristiadi
The paper introduces an active preference learning framework for many-objective Bayesian optimization that models preferences as a Dirichlet-process mixture of latent archetypes. It uses mixture-aware information-theoretic query strategies to separately identify archetypes and refine preferences within each archetype, employing a hybrid acquisition policy. Experiments on synthetic benchmarks and a real-world chemical process design case study show that this approach outperforms existing preference-based Bayesian optimization methods and recovers interpretable latent preference structures.
By Manisha Dubey, Sebastiaan De Peuter, Wanrong Wang, Samuel Kaski
The paper presents a portfolio-based approach to constrained multi-objective Bayesian optimization for materials design, framing acquisition‑function selection as an adaptive policy problem. Two controllers—UCB‑Bandit, a modified UCB multi‑armed bandit, and Agentic‑Switch, a multi‑agent system powered by a large language model—were tested against fixed‑policy baselines on synthetic benchmarks and two real materials design case studies. The adaptive policies achieved competitive results in cumulative feasibility counts and feasible hypervolume improvement, outperforming individual acquisition functions that excelled only in a single metric.
By Sushant Sinha, Christofer Hardcastle, Robert Robinson, Shakti Prasad Padhy, Brent Vela, Douglas Allaire, Raymundo Arroyave