arXiv AI
Available but Unclaimed: An Empirical Study of Human-AI Synergy
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 19
Supporting Calibrated Reliance in Human-AI Collaboration: Different Strategies for Different Tasks
The study investigates how different AI support formats influence human decision-making across two tasks: abstract visual reasoning with RAVEN matrices and deductive logical reasoning with LSAT problems. Findings reveal that in visual reasoning, predictions alone and predicted probabilities best support accuracy and error recovery, while in logical reasoning, LLM explanations outperform other supports. The results suggest that effective human–AI collaboration requires task‑specific support strategies rather than a one‑size‑fits‑all approach.
arXiv AI
Sep 18
A Neuropsychologically Grounded Evaluation of LLM Cognitive Abilities
The paper introduces NeuroCognition, a benchmark based on three neuropsychological tests—Raven's Progressive Matrices, Spatial Working Memory, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test—to evaluate foundational cognitive abilities in large language models (LLMs). It finds that while LLMs excel on text tasks, their performance drops on image-based and more complex tasks, and they fail different parts of the same tasks compared to humans. NeuroCognition correlates with standard general-capability benchmarks yet measures distinct cognitive skills, highlighting where LLMs align with or diverge from human-like intelligence.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
On the Generalization of Steering Vectors for Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness
arXiv:2607. 29062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model capabilities have improved in large part due to scaling chain of thought.
arXiv AI
Aug 17
The Metacognitive Bottleneck: Japanese Riddles Reveal Fundamental Limits of Machine Insight and Self-Evaluation in Reasoning AI
arXiv:2509. 14704v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Benchmark saturation and training-data contamination increasingly obscure whether reported gains in large language models (LLMs) reflect genuine advances in reasoning or familiarity with recurring patterns in benchmark problems.
arXiv AI
Jul 24
AI Assistants Overassist
arXiv:2607. 21306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as tutors and thought partners, helping users reason through problems.
arXiv AI
Aug 17
Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don't
arXiv:2608. 14036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Skills have emerged as a practical and effective approach for enhancing LLM agents at inference time through structured packages of knowledge.