arXiv:2606. 20950v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Executable evaluation -- checking the consequences of an agent's actions with a program rather than grading its prose -- has become a prominent way to assess tool-using AI agents in software settings.
By Sergei Trashchenkov
arXiv:2607. 18147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems have evolved from natural language tasks to using external tools to plan, retrieve, and act in technical domains.
By Daniela Rojas, Abdulwahab Albassam, Aidan G. Leung, Jett Ngo, Ryan Luo, Peter R. Quawas, Junpyung Kim, Kangkai Liang, Mansi Nanavati, Jonathan Mai, Meng-Chi Tsai, Yun-Tong Tsai, Yize Chen, Yuanyuan Shi
arXiv:2611.07372v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: An LLM agent's cost and success depend on its model, its harness, and its environment. In addition to the widely studied directions of parameter tuning...
By Mingxuan Li, Huanzhi Mao, Qiuyang Mang, Hanchen Li, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Alex Dimakis
arXiv:2606. 09037v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study presents a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent framework for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) design optimization that mitigates limitations of conventional workflows: expertise-dependent problem setup and data preparation, the prohibitive computational cost of finite element analysis (FEA), and the unreliability of AI surrogates in unexplored regions.
By Jinseong Han, Sunwoong Yang, Namwoo Kang
arXiv:2608.21976v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agentic AI has automated parts of scientific discovery, including paper generation, expert-level coding, therapeutic proposal, and autonomous experimen...
By Tianyi Yu, Chengxing Tao, Haoxuan Shen, Huiyang Li, Rugang Chen, Long Teng, Lilin Wang, Yan Li, Qingbin Chen, Chaogang Xu, Lizhong Wang
The paper presents an integrated approach that combines large language models (LLMs) with numerical solvers to accelerate redesign in engineering, specifically targeting electric vehicle battery pack cost minimization. Three LLM integration strategies—warm start, variable fixing, and ReAct—are evaluated alongside four black-box solvers, showing that the integrated method can achieve comparable design quality with 80% fewer simulator evaluations and a higher rate of near-optimal solutions. The study highlights that the optimal LLM-solver pairing depends on the nature of the redesign scenario and that larger LLMs provide greater benefits when they exert more control over the search process.
By Chan-Eui Song, Jeremy J. Michalek, Christopher McComb