arXiv:2609.14666v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Turn-taking is a fundamental component of spoken interaction, and while humans naturally rely on both verbal and non-verbal signals, dialogue systems...
By Willem Berner, Julio Cesar Cavalcanti, Kalle {\AA}str\"om, Gabriel Skantze
arXiv:2606. 16731v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current multiparty turn-taking models often rely on complex microphone arrays or multi-camera setups, limiting their applicability in human-robot interaction scenarios.
By Haotian Qi, Gabriel Skantze
arXiv:2606. 16568v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable turn-taking is essential for spoken dialogue systems.
By Rutherford A. Patamia, Ming Liu, Wei Luo, Favour Ekong, Akan Cosgun
arXiv:2609.10394v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Current audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) benchmarks, like LRS3, rely heavily on clean, scripted and rehearsed speech. They fail to reflect the...
By Rishabh Jain, Aristeidis Papadopoulos, Zhaofeng Lin, Naomi Harte
TurnBench is a new multi‑domain benchmark for evaluating turn‑taking dynamics in spoken dialogue. It comprises a 30‑hour hand‑labeled corpus of dyadic human conversations, a standardized evaluation protocol for end‑of‑turn and interruption detection, and covers six distinct interaction styles with triple annotation. The benchmark also provides a 104‑hour training set, a public leaderboard, and an interactive dataset viewer at https://turnbench.sesame.com.
By Freeman Jiang, Ramon Sanabria, Soham Deshmukh, Bandhav Veluri, Simon Michael Vuch Williams, Elliott K. Suen, Garreth Lee, Kevin Yoonho Choi, Takuya Umeki, Riku Kubo, Sathvik Udupa, Chien-yu Huang, Shih-Yun Shan Kuan, Zhuoyan Tao, Satyapriya Krishna, Sefik Emre Eskimez, Yu Tsao, Hung-yi Lee, Shinji Watanabe
CIViC (Conditional Input and Visual Interpretation Checks) is a four‑gate protocol designed to link interpretation to intervention, held‑out task comparison, or endpoint control in audio‑conditioned visual prediction. The authors evaluate CIViC on three proxy tasks—actor‑disjoint face‑raster tests, a synthetic audio‑feature mixture, and source‑video‑disjoint SpeakerVid—showing that different gates reveal distinct effects of audio manipulation on visual outputs. Across these tasks, CIViC demonstrates that output activation, held‑out error, and endpoint controls can support varied interpretations of audio influence on visual predictions.
By Mengzhe Geng, Max W. Y. Lam, Yuewen Cao, Shoukang Hu, Jing Xu, Marc Tessier, Xu Li