Attention Transfer Is Not Universally Effective for Vision Transformers
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2607. 18363v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Feed-forward networks hold two thirds of a transformer's non-embedding parameters, yet the architecture has not received a necessity test that controls parameters, compute, and depth at once.
arXiv:2606. 16429v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hybrid linear attention models offer an appealing path to faster long-context inference: they reduce the quadratic cost and KV-cache burden of full softmax attention while retaining much of the quality of Transformer models.
arXiv:2602. 06883v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The smoothness of the transformer architecture has been extensively studied in the context of generalization, training stability, and adversarial robustness.
The paper introduces CODI, a method that enhances self‑supervised Vision Transformers by mixing a small portion of the teacher’s class‑token distribution into each teacher patch‑token target. This cross distillation approach gives every masked patch an attention‑independent semantic correction without altering the architecture. Experiments demonstrate that CODI improves performance on both dense prediction and image‑level tasks under aligned pretraining settings.
Self-supervised Vision Transformers learn strong image-level representations, but their patch-level representations can be unreliable for dense prediction. We study this mismatch and find that the cla...
arXiv:2607.09086v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present Subtoken Vision Transformer (SubViT), a selective image tokenization method for fine-grained visual recognition. Standard Vision Transfo...