arXiv:2602. 04935v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adapting LLM agents to domain-specific tool calling remains notably brittle under evolving interfaces.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 03054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-augmented vision-language agents can acquire external perceptual evidence through OCR, detection, segmentation, and other tools, but executing every proposed tool call is costly and sometimes unnecessary.
UniToolCall introduces a unified framework for tool-use in large language model agents, standardizing toolset construction, dataset generation, and evaluation. The framework aggregates over 22,000 tools and creates a hybrid training corpus of more than 390,000 instances by combining ten public datasets with synthetically generated, structurally controlled trajectories. It models diverse interaction patterns—single‑hop vs. multi‑hop, single‑turn vs. multi‑turn, serial vs. parallel execution—and adds an Anchor Linkage mechanism to enforce cross‑turn dependencies, while converting seven public benchmarks into a common Query–Action–Observation–Answer format for fine‑grained evaluation.
arXiv:2610.14774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to orchestrate diverse tools over long-horizon tasks. Existing agents typically use Direct Tool...
arXiv:2609.36679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning engineering (MLE) agents have made substantial progress, but learning through ML experimentation remains costly in time and computatio...
arXiv:2606. 12882v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents for long-horizon tasks, yet their performance is shaped not only by model capability and environment design, but also by the harness that mediates agent--environment interaction.
The paper introduces RobustBench‑TC, a benchmark that tests tool‑use language agents under 22 real‑world perturbations affecting observations, actions, rewards, and transitions. Experiments on 21 models show that observation noise has minimal impact, while reward‑relevant and transition noise drastically reduce accuracy, and model size alone does not mitigate these gaps. The authors propose ToolRL‑DR, a domain‑randomized reinforcement‑learning recipe that improves robustness, retaining most clean accuracy and narrowing performance gaps even on unseen transition perturbations.