Are Benchmarks Reliable? Toward Structural Diagnosis via Item-Level Capability Boundaries
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2610.14542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal benchmarks are central to evaluating whether models can reason over information from multiple modalities. However, existing literature has r...
Decision models support routing, guardrails, and output verification in LLM systems. However, item accuracy alone cannot establish whether models make correct decisions across controlled variations or...
arXiv:2610.28522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models support routing, guardrails, and output verification in LLM systems. However, item accuracy alone cannot establish whether models make...
arXiv:2608.30372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models rapidly advance, performance on standard multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) benchmarks is reaching saturation. While th...
arXiv:2606. 00301v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) arise from heterogeneous failure mechanisms, making reliable detection difficult for any single global uncertainty score.
arXiv:2608.30044v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are commonly compared by averaging scores across a benchmark list with equal weight. Such lists grow through publication outside an exp...