arXiv Computation and Language
Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6
Benchmarking and Enhancing LLMs for Rule-Intensive Review of National Standard Documents
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support complex professional tasks, yet their capabilities in rule-intensive document review remain insufficiently evaluated. National standard documents, such as China GB/T standards, offer a representative testbed: they are lengthy, highly structured, and governed by explicit rules for scope, terminology, normative wording, and cross-section consistency.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Beyond Shapley: An Influence-Based Data Auditing Pipeline for LLM Alignment and Evaluation
arXiv:2607. 22766v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly bottlenecked by data quality.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26
DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluation
arXiv:2606. 26429v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM evaluation relies on two complementary but often disconnected signals: static benchmarks with objective correctness labels and arena-style preference data that better reflect open-ended user interactions.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets
arXiv:2609.07095v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM assistants often produce more answers than humans can review before users see them. Most evaluations ask whether an answer is wrong, unsupported, o...
arXiv AI
Jun 26
Ask, Don't Judge: Binary Questions for Interpretable LLM Evaluation and Self-Improvement
arXiv:2606. 27226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating LLM outputs remains a major bottleneck in NLP: human evaluation is expensive and slow, lexical metrics correlate poorly with human judgments on open-ended generation, and holistic LLM judges often produce opaque scores that are hard to debug.
arXiv AI
6d ago
Efficient Safety Benchmarking via Item Response Theory
The paper demonstrates that Item Response Theory (IRT) can uncover meaningful structure in safety benchmarks for language models, allowing adaptive item selection to approximate full benchmark rankings with Spearman’s ρ > 0.90 while cutting evaluation costs by at least 80% and up to 99.9% on some suites. It also proposes a static method to extract a small, informative subset of items that can be reused across models, achieving 80–99.8% cost savings. These findings show that psychometric techniques can make safety evaluation more efficient without sacrificing ranking accuracy.