arXiv:2606. 18075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, yet existing graph-based methods face a fundamental limitation: entity-centric and chunk-centric approaches operate on representations anchored to original text without true knowledge fusion.
By Haoyang Zhong, Yifei Sun, Antong Zhang, Chunping Wang, Lei Chen, Yang Yang
arXiv:2606. 00610v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become an essential method for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging external knowledge.
By Chuanjie Wu, Zhishang Xiang, Yunbo Tang, Zerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su
arXiv:2610.34866v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across tasks, but they still struggle with complex reasoning that requires integrating...
By Zicheng Zhao, Linhao Luo, Zongji Yu, Junnan Dong, Yanchao Tan, Shirui Pan, Chen Gong
arXiv:2608.22762v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) is a key task for evaluating KG-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs), and complex KGQA that requires multi-...
By Chenhui Liu, Jianpeng Zhou, Jiahai Wang
arXiv:2603. 29875v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: One of the key problems in Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems is that chunk-based retrieval pipelines represent the source chunks as atomic objects, mixing the information contained within such a chunk into a single vector.
By Ryszard Tuora, Mateusz Gali\'nski, Micha{\l} Godziszewski, Micha{\l} Karpowicz, Mateusz Czy\.znikiewicz, Adam Kozakiewicz, Tomasz Zi\k{e}tkiewicz
The paper investigates a parametric approach to knowledge graph memory by compiling each entity into a LoRA adapter, enabling zero‑cost query-time retrieval via weight injection. On the MetaQA dataset, these adapters encode context‑free factual knowledge, improving exact‑match scores by up to +0.243 over a base model and achieving an oracle gap of +0.283. However, the stored knowledge is not recoverable through similarity or embedding‑based methods, indicating that knowledge is stored locally and does not transfer across semantically neighboring entities.
By Martino M. L. Pulici, Cuong Xuan Chu, Evgeny Kharlamov, Volker Tresp