arXiv:2609.37959v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tabular machine learning typically relies on per-dataset workflows, fitting tree ensembles or running AutoML searches from scratch for every task. We p...
By Weihao Kong, Erez Louidor Ilan, Shuxin Nie, Taman Narayan, Rajat Sen, Yichen Zhou, Deqing Fu, Samet Oymak, Abhimanyu Das
arXiv:2608. 01400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, driven by in-context learning, have rapidly grown in quality and popularity.
By Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Alex Labach, Zexin Xue, Shuyi Han, Valentin Thomas, Anthony L. Caterini
TabSieve is a select‑then‑predict framework that explicitly chooses a small set of informative rows from a table as evidence before predicting a missing target. The authors build a large synthetic dataset, TabSieve‑SFT‑40K, and introduce a reinforcement learning method, TAB‑GRPO, to jointly optimize evidence selection and prediction. Experiments on 75 classification and 52 regression tables show consistent performance gains, with TabSieve improving classification by 2.92% and regression by 4.45% over the best baseline while enhancing robustness to noisy context.
By Yongyao Wang, Ziqi Miao, Lu Yang, Haonan Jia, Wenting Yan, Chen Qian, Lijun Li
arXiv:2608. 16429v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundational models for tabular data have made significant progress in recent years, with TabICLv2 reporting state-of-the-art performance on several tabular classification tasks.
By Beimnet Bekele Guta
arXiv:2605. 24417v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Supervised classification on tabular data remains a central machine learning task, but its dependence on large labeled datasets limits its applicability in data-scarce settings.
By Daria Grushina, Kseniia Kuvshinova, Alina Kostromina, Aziz Temirkhanov, Mile Mitrovic, Dmitry Simakov
arXiv:2606. 07345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, exemplified by TabPFN, perform prediction via in-context learning, inferring test labels directly from labeled training examples.
By Si-Yang Liu, Han-Jia Ye