arXiv Computer Vision By Md Shihabul Islam Shovo, Nishi Kanta Paul, Jamil Fayyad

APED-CXR: Adaptive Privileged Evidence Distillation for Chest X-Ray Grounding with Image-Only Inference

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

APED-CXR is a compact chest X‑ray model that localizes findings using only image input at test time. It distills spatial evidence from a frozen multimodal teacher—trained on radiographs and reports—into a 11.1 M‑parameter student, which predicts diseases and bounding boxes from shared evidence maps. Training with teacher‑guided proposal refinement improves box‑level localization F1 from 0.302 to 0.338 on PadChest‑GR and raises recall on NIH ChestX-ray14 from 0.423 to 0.447, while preserving diagnostic AUC.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

C$^2$A: Coupling Spatial Evidence with Clinical Priors via Co-occurrence Aware Class Attention for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification

arXiv:2608. 09774v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Thoracic pathologies rarely occur in isolation, yet standard multi-label classifiers rely on shared global descriptors, discarding \emph{where} findings lie and \emph{how} they co-occur.

By Akash Gogineni, Nagur Shareef Shaik, Aasrith Mandava, Adnan Masood, Dong Hye Ye
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

RadPRISM: Schema-stratified radiology-report supervision for concept-disentangled image representations and visual grounding

arXiv:2608. 00147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language pretraining learns rich medical image representations from radiology reports, but previous model variants commonly operate within a single shared embedding space, so concept-level structure and interpretability must be recovered post hoc, limiting model transparency and, hence, clinical utility.

By Fabian Drexel, Marlene Fritzsche, Era Stambollxhiu, Miriam Kumpf, Lena Schmitzer, Lea Schumann, Jannik Kahmann, Friedrich Puttkammer, Johannes Moll, Jannik L\"ubberstedt, Zeineb Ben Chaaben, Anirudh Narayanan, Cosmin I. Bercea, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Marcus R. Makowski, Daniel Rueckert, Lisa C. Adams, Keno K. Bressem
arXiv Computer Vision
5d ago

GazeRIB: Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Reader Gaze-Guided Chest X-ray Learning

The study introduces GazeRIB, a method that uses radiologists’ gaze data to mask unseen regions during training of chest X‑ray models. By comparing panels of three, five, and eight readers against individual readers across multiple architectures, the authors found that panels consistently improved macro F1 scores by 5.33–7.47 percentage points, with three readers capturing most of the benefit. External validation showed panel‑based models also enhanced ROC‑AUC on the SIIM‑FISABIO‑RSNA dataset, though results varied on other cohorts.

By Nattakorn Kittisut, Roy M. Gabriel, Marly van Assen, Mohammadreza Zandehshahvar, Carlo N. De Cecco, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Ali Adibi
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

MultiViewDx: Evidence-Linked Multi-View Clinical Diagnosis

MultiViewDx is a physician‑validated multimodal instruction dataset that links medical imaging studies with patient context and normalizes heterogeneous reports into an evidence‑linked workflow (evidence → findings → differential discussion → diagnosis). The dataset covers a wide range of imaging modalities and uses a unified image‑text retriever to ensure that instruction synthesis is grounded in source‑supported evidence. Fine‑tuned models on MultiViewDx achieve the highest average accuracy on four MedVQA benchmarks and receive the strongest overall rating on JAMA Clinical Challenge cases, with ablations confirming the importance of case‑level multi‑view organization and evidence‑linked reasoning.

By Junda Wang, Zonghai Yao, Yujan Ting, Eric Z. Chen, Hieu Tran, Hong Yu, Weijing Huang, Terrence Chen
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 22

From Theory to Decision Rule: Calibrating the Noisy-Label Crossover for Vision-Language Model Weak Supervision Across Three Medical-Imaging Benchmarks

The study investigates when adding zero‑shot pseudo‑labels from vision‑language models (VLMs) to small expert‑labelled medical imaging datasets ceases to improve, and may even degrade, classifier performance. Across three benchmarks—PatchCamelyon, ISIC 2019, and NIH ChestX‑ray14—the crossover point occurs after roughly 20–50, 100, and 250–500 expert labels, respectively, with additional pseudo‑labels reducing macro‑AUC by up to 0.14 points. The analysis shows that the VLM’s labeling quality, rather than the student model size, limits performance, and a simple bias‑variance rule can predict the benefit of pseudo‑labels in most settings.

By Bruce Changlong Xu, Jose K. James, Alexander J. Ryu