End-to-end vision-language navigation (VLN) with causal vision-language models can map instructions and egocentric observations directly to actions, but standard behavior cloning supervises only the next action and does not explicitly train the policy state to be predictive of future visual outcomes. We first ask a diagnostic question: if the policy is given an expert-trajectory future image as privileged input at training and testing time, is that additional visual evidence useful for choosing the current action?
arXiv:2609.37250v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: World-action models (WAMs) couple future visual-state prediction with action generation. By adapting video generators or image-editing models pretrai...
By Yang Zhang, Jiangyuan Zhao, Chenyou Fan, Jiayu Hu, Xiu Yuan, Chenjia Bai, Xiu Li
arXiv:2608. 11605v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World Action Models (WAMs) couple future visual prediction with robot action generation, enabling policies to model how the physical world evolves during interaction.
By Jiakai Huang, Zhongbo Wu, Zheng Zhang, Zihan Wang, Shan You, Tao Huang
arXiv:2609.36645v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Future prediction is increasingly used to improve vision-language-action (VLA) policies, based on the premise that anticipating scene evolution encou...
By Hanseul Kim, Jewon Yeom, Youngjoon Jeong, Minsoo Jo, Taesup Kim
arXiv:2609.39324v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently incorporated world models to provide richer dynamic supervision beyond sparse action labels. Howeve...
By Jingqiu Wang, Yan Wang
ForeTime‑VLA is a causal vision‑language‑action policy that distills future‑aware representations from a frozen Fast‑WAM teacher, enabling it to anticipate contact events during conveyor‑belt manipulation. The method compresses current and future video latents into a 64‑dimensional target, uses an eight‑frame history encoder to predict this target along with manipulation phase and time‑to‑transition, and conditions a VLM prefix on future tokens and phase. On a deduplicated conveyor‑belt dataset, ForeTime‑VLA reduces test MAE by 2.63% and L2 by 3.02%, while real‑robot experiments show significantly higher grasp success rates compared to the next‑best reference.
whyItMatters":"The approach demonstrates that distilling future‑token knowledge from a world‑action model can improve dynamic manipulation performance without the computational cost of running the teacher at inference time."
By Siyuan Ma, Yutian Zhang, Boshi Zhang, Qinglian Wu, Jiaqi Zhai, Dong Wei, Xiaojin Huang