The k-means++ algorithm is commonly restarted multiple times to avoid poor local optima, yet the number of restarts is almost always chosen arbitrarily and applied uniformly regardless of data set difficulty. This undermines any comparison relying on such a choice and wastes computation on easy data sets while potentially under-serving hard ones.
arXiv:2607. 26202v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The $k$-means++ algorithm is a standard and widely used seeding method for $k$-means clustering, but for a fixed number $k$ of centers its worst-case expected approximation ratio is $\Theta(\log k)$.
By Vaclav Rozhon
arXiv:2607. 04949v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the problem of k-means clustering on large datasets.
By Cristian Boldrin, Fabio Vandin
arXiv:2607. 15835v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Big data clustering remains challenging: the Minimum Sum-of-Squares Clustering (MSSC) problem underlying K-means is NP-hard, and existing methods either reach poor local minima or require prohibitive metaheuristic hybrids.
By Ravil Mussabayev, Rustam Mussabayev, Zukhra Yerdaliyeva, Kuldeyev Nursultan
arXiv:2607. 01945v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The classical $k$-means clustering cannot be directly used to incomplete data, and existing $k$-means-based clustering for missing data primarily focus on improving the practical accuracy of clustering, whereas most of them lack theoretical guarantees in the asymptotic sense.
By Xin Guan
arXiv:2602. 13935v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While LLMs have seen substantial improvement in reasoning capabilities, they also sometimes overthink, generating unnecessary reasoning steps, particularly under uncertainty, given ill-posed or ambiguous queries.
By Yangxinyu Xie, Tao Wang, Soham Mallick, Yan Sun, Georgy Noarov, Mengxin Yu, Tanwi Mallick, Weijie J. Su, Edgar Dobriban