arXiv:2606. 11699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of machine learning and deep learning models largely depends on the quality of the training data.
By Ha-Linh Nguyen, Hong-Anh Nguyen, Minh-Duc La, Thu-Trang Nguyen, Son Nguyen, Hieu Dinh Vo
arXiv:2607. 23865v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Supervised deep learning models rely on large, accurately labeled datasets, yet noisy annotations are often unavoidable and can severely degrade performance under high noise levels.
By Chengqi Li, Yangdi Lu, Zhihao Shi, Wenbo He, Chamseddine Talhi, Nadjia Kara
arXiv:2606. 28654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifiers suffer from poor calibration when their softmax outputs (predictive confidence) deviate from the empirical likelihoods.
By Thiru Thillai Nadarasar Bahavan, Sachith Seneviratne, Saman Halgamuge
arXiv:2606. 14965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit.
By Shadman Islam, Agustinus Kristiadi, Mostafa Milani
arXiv:2607. 16231v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern neural networks can fit corrupted training labels, making noisy-label learning a useful setting for studying memorization-driven overfitting.
By Richard Mai
arXiv:2607. 05393v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Time-domain surveys generate many transient candidates, making Real-Bogus classification a critical step in automated discovery pipelines.
By Rapha\"el Bonnet-Guerrini, Bruno Sanchez, Dominique Fouchez, Benjamin Racine, Maya Guy, Mariam Sabalbal, Manal Yassine, Vincenzo Piuri